In the conversation
Ryan Englin on SalesPOP! Expert Interviews: AI, Frontline Managers, and the Work Only Humans Do
Key takeaways
- AI is not coming for the frontline manager's job. It takes the busywork off the manager's plate. What's left is the part only a human does, which is connecting with people.
- AI drafts the reminder, the tough conversation script, and the performance review. The manager still delivers it. Drafting was never the valuable part of the job.
- A $15 AI subscription buys you a draft, not a finished product. Validating a single output costs around $100 in human time. Doing AI right costs more than the tool.
- AI slop is a documentation problem. Feed the tool documented SOPs and put human judgment on every output. Without both, you publish garbage with your name on it.
- AI hallucinates. If you don't know the work well enough to catch it, you have no business trusting the output. Learn the tool and stay smarter than it.
- Promoting your best person into a role that exposes their weaknesses is not a reward. It's a setup for failure. Clear job descriptions tell people exactly what winning looks like.
I went on SalesPOP! Expert Interviews with John Golden to talk about whether AI is coming for frontline managers, and why I believe the opposite is true.
The fear is everywhere right now. Every owner I talk to has a version of the same question. Will AI replace my supervisors, my dispatchers, my field leads? My answer on the show was direct. No. AI does not replace the person who looks a technician in the eye and asks what is actually going on at home. AI replaces the busywork that keeps that person from ever having the conversation.
That is the real problem John and I opened with. Frontline managers have no time. They got promoted because they were the best technician, the best installer, the best foreman. Now they carry a truck full of admin work nobody trained them to do. Reminders. Documentation. Performance reviews they dread writing. Difficult conversations they rehearse in the parking lot and never have. The work that only a human does keeps getting pushed to the bottom of the list because the paperwork screams louder.
So use the tool for the paperwork. AI drafts the reminder. AI drafts the script for the tough conversation. AI drafts the performance review. Then the manager does the part no machine does, which is sitting across from a human being and connecting. That is the trade I want every owner in the trades to make. Give the robot the busywork. Give the leader the relationship.
I was also blunt about the cost, because the sales pitch on AI is dishonest about it. A fifteen dollar plan produces a draft. My team spends somewhere around a hundred dollars of human time validating that draft. Editing. Fact checking. Making sure it sounds like us and not like everyone else. AI slop is real, and it is expensive. It costs you credibility with candidates, with customers, and with your own people. I told John about a hallucination that genuinely rattled me. The output looked confident and clean and it was wrong. Confidence is not accuracy.
The cure is not more AI. The cure is documented SOPs and human judgment. AI is only as good as the inputs you feed it, and most contractors have nothing documented. The process lives in the owner's head. That is the same reason the owner stays the bottleneck in every business I walk into. When I run Stop the Bleeding with a new client, one of the three things I look for is whether anything is written down. No documented systems means no delegation, no scale, and now, no useful AI. Write the process down and the tool becomes powerful. Skip that step and you automated your chaos.
John and I also got into something that matters more than any of this. Stop promoting people into their weaknesses. The trades do this constantly. Take the best foreman, hand him a superintendent title, hand him nothing else. No onboarding. No training. No clarity. I had a client call me six months after a promotion like that wanting to fire the guy. I asked whether he had been onboarded for the new role. He had not. I told the owner to ask the man how he felt he was performing and then offer his old job back. The owner was certain he would refuse. He was thrilled. He never knew asking was an option.
That is not a people problem. It is a clarity problem. And it is fixable.
Clarity starts with the job itself. Most job descriptions in the trades are seven pages of legal language nobody has updated in a decade, or they are two lines and a phone number. Neither one tells a human being what winning looks like. When I build a Core Fit Profile with a client, we define the observable behaviors of a rockstar in that specific seat. Shows up early. Looks the customer in the eye. Cleans the job site. Those behaviors drive the ad, the interview, the onboarding, and the review. Now your manager has a standard to lead against instead of a gut feeling to argue about. Now AI has something real to draft from.
The last thing I told John is the thing I want owners to sit with. Be smarter than the tool. Learn it. Do not hand it authority you have not earned back through validation. The people who lose their jobs to AI are not the ones doing human work. They are the ones who refused to learn how the tool works while everyone around them did.
Your people are still your product. AI does not change that. It just gives your leaders their time back so they finally lead.
If you liked this, I go deeper on how promotions and onboarding break good people, and how to build the systems that keep them, on Titans of the Trades.
Listen to the full conversation