In the conversation
Ryan Englin on The Builders' Table: Why Retention Starts With Leadership
Key takeaways
- Keeping great people in construction starts with giving them a reason to stay. Retention begins with understanding what your people need from their leaders.
- Promoting your best craft professional does not automatically make them a great leader. Craft skill and leadership skill are two different things. Train for the second one.
- Micromanagement is rarely a personality flaw. It shows up when you hand someone a leadership role and never teach them how to lead.
- Mentorship and consistent communication carry people through an entire career, not just the first few weeks on the job.
- Leaders need a system for communicating with their crews, not good intentions. Core Matters built Field Connect so field leaders communicate consistently instead of hoping it happens.
- Invest in leadership development and employee development, and retention takes care of itself. Skip it and you keep replacing the same people.
I went on The Builders' Table with Jennifer Wilkerson to talk about why keeping great people in construction has almost nothing to do with perks and almost everything to do with leadership.
Here is where the conversation started. Retention begins with understanding what your people actually need from their leaders. Not what you assume they need. Not what you needed when you were 24 and swinging a hammer. What they need, right now, from the person who signs off on their day.
Most owners I talk to describe turnover as a market problem. It isn't a market problem. It's a leadership problem. And it is fixable.
The promotion that breaks your best person
Jennifer and I spent real time on this one because it happens constantly. You take your best craft professional, the guy who never misses, the guy the crew already listens to, and you promote him. Then six months later you want to fire him.
Promoting a great craft professional does not automatically make them a great leader. Those are two different jobs with two different skill sets. One is about mastering the work. The other is about developing people who do the work.
I had a client call me exactly this way. He promoted his best foreman to superintendent and wanted him gone half a year later. I asked one question. Did you train him or onboard him for the new role? No. So I told him to ask the man how he felt he was performing, then offer him his old job back. The owner was certain he'd refuse. The foreman was ecstatic. He never knew asking was an option.
That's not a bad employee. That's a company that skipped onboarding because "he's already been through all that." Every promotion is a new hire. Treat it like one. My 2412 Launch onboarding process applies to internal moves the same way it applies to somebody walking through the door for the first time. Two weeks of belonging. Four weeks of process. Twelve weeks to full ownership.
Micromanagement is a training gap wearing a costume
We also got into micromanagement, which I see the same way I see turnover. It's a symptom.
Nobody wakes up wanting to hover. Micromanagement shows up when a new leader has no framework, no coaching, and no idea what good leadership looks like in your company. So they default to control, because control feels like competence. Then the crew disengages, the leader tightens the grip, and the whole thing spirals.
Fix the training and the behavior changes. Leave the training gap alone and you'll blame the person for something you never taught them.
Mentorship and consistent communication
The two things Jennifer and I kept circling back to were mentorship and consistency. Not annual reviews. Annual reviews deliver feedback eleven months too late.
People in the field want to know where they stand, what's next, and that somebody actually noticed. I did an exit interview once for a client whose financial controller quit after nearly three years. Two words explained it. He never said thank you. She had told him more than fifty times that acknowledgment mattered. His response was always "why would I thank you for doing your job?" Her leaving set that business back six months.
That's the whole game. People don't leave jobs. They leave people. And they leave people because there's no relationship there.
Communication in the field is harder than communication in an office, and I refuse to pretend otherwise. Crews are spread across job sites. Leaders are stretched thin. That's exactly why we built Field Connect at Core Matters, to give field leaders a way to communicate more effectively with the people they lead instead of hoping it happens on its own.
The line I hold on this
If someone leaves in the first 90 days, that's a hiring issue. If they leave after 90 days, that's a leadership or culture issue. That line tells you where to spend your energy.
And if you keep hiring well but losing people anyway, stop rewriting the job ad. Investigate your management team first. Your best people already know who is leading well and who is not.
Investing in leadership development is not a soft expense. It's the highest-return dollar in your business, because your leaders determine whether the people you worked so hard to attract ever get a reason to stay. I wrote Hire Better People Faster about the front end of this. The back end is leadership, and it's where most contractors lose the people they already paid to find.
Thanks to Jennifer Wilkerson and The Builders' Table for a conversation that went straight at the real problem instead of the convenient one.
If you liked this, I go deeper on developing frontline leaders and building retention systems that hold up under pressure on Titans of the Trades.
Listen to the full conversation